+91 98335 30200  ·  sales@tcreng.com

Services · Asset Integrity and Engineering Consulting

Boiler Tube Failure Analysis

A tube failure is a symptom. The mechanism is what decides whether the unit comes back up or fails again in the same header.

Paresh Haribhakti, Managing Director of TCR Advanced Engineering, is a co-author of Failure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach, published by ASM International, Ohio, in 2018.

Request a Quote

Overview

TCR Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. performs boiler tube failure analysis at its Navi Mumbai, India laboratory, NABL ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited (certificate NABLT0726MH18640) and an IBR Well-Known Material Testing Laboratory since 2014. It investigates boiler, superheater, reheater, economiser, waterwall and fired heater tube failures, drawing on 1,500+ documented tube failure investigations and 400+ boiler remaining-life assessments.

Types of Boiler Tube Failure, and Why the Mechanism Decides the Repair

Every boiler tube failure looks broadly the same from the walkway: a hole, a split, a burst. The mechanisms behind them are entirely different, and so are the corrective actions. Replacing the tube without naming the mechanism buys the interval to the next failure and nothing more.

  • Short-term overheating gives a thin-lipped fish-mouth rupture with heavy plastic deformation and a transformed microstructure. The cause is a loss of flow, not a loss of material.
  • Long-term overheating and creep gives a thick-lipped rupture, longitudinal cracking, external oxide scale and a microstructure that has spheroidised, coarsened its carbides and, at the end, cavitated on the grain boundaries.
  • Waterside corrosion fatigue gives transverse, oxide-filled cracks initiating on the inside surface at points of restraint, and it is a cycling and chemistry problem together.
  • Caustic gouging and acid phosphate corrosion give irregular internal wall loss under a deposit, and both are settled by deposit analysis, not by looking at the metal.
  • Hydrogen damage gives a thick-lipped, window-type failure with decarburisation and intergranular microfissuring, and the surrounding tubes are usually affected before they leak.
  • Fireside and coal-ash corrosion gives external wastage under a molten or semi-molten deposit, with a characteristic layered scale.
  • Erosion from fly ash, soot blowers, falling slag or coal particles gives directional external thinning with a polished or scalloped surface.
  • Dissimilar metal weld failure gives a fracture at or just off the ferritic side of the transition, and it is a design and thermal-expansion problem, not a welding-quality problem.
  • Graphitisation, thermal fatigue, stress corrosion cracking and maintenance damage complete the set, and each has its own signature.

TCR reports against the full named taxonomy rather than against a general description, because a plant that is told "overheating" cannot act, and a plant that is told "long-term overheating with an estimated tube metal temperature above design and a spheroidised microstructure" can.

What Causes Boiler Tube Failure Due to Overheating?

Boiler tube failure due to overheating happens when tube metal runs hotter than its material allows, either briefly and severely or slightly for months. TCR Engineering, an IBR Well-Known Material Testing Laboratory in Navi Mumbai, India, separates the two, because short-term and long-term overheating have different causes and the plant fix for one does nothing for the other.

Overheating patternWhat starves or insulates the tubeWhere it usually appearsWhat the plant corrects
Short-term overheatingA sudden loss of cooling flow: a tube blocked by debris or a foreign object left after maintenance, low drum level, or firing raised faster than circulation was establishedWaterwall and superheater tubes, within hours of the upsetThe flow path and the start-up practice, not the tube material
Long-term overheating and creepSteam-side oxide scale or water-side deposit that insulates the wall, so metal temperature climbs over years at unchanged firingSuperheater and reheater outlet legs and the hottest elevationsScale and deposit control, the tube grade, and the remaining life of the circuit
Flue-gas imbalanceUneven gas temperature across the furnace: burner imbalance, slagging that diverts gas, or soot-blower coverage gapsThe same panels or lanes, failing repeatedly in the same positionCombustion tuning and soot-blower coverage
Material or layout shortfallA lower-grade tube installed in a hot location, or a circuit change that altered the flow distributionAt replacement tubes, transitions and modified circuitsMaterial verification at procurement and the circuit design

Reading Tube Metal Temperature from the Tube Itself

The most useful number in a superheater or reheater investigation is rarely on any instrument. It is the temperature the metal actually saw, and the tube carries two independent records of it.

EvidenceWhat is measuredWhat it establishes
Steam-side oxide scale thicknessScale thickness measured metallographically on a transverse sectionAn estimate of the accumulated tube metal temperature history, read through the standard oxide-growth correlations
Microstructural degradation stagePearlite spheroidisation, carbide coarsening, carbide precipitation at grain boundaries, creep cavitationHow far through its creep life the material has run, independently of any temperature record
HardnessHardness traverse across the wallSoftening consistent with the degradation stage, and the presence of any unintended transformed layer
Dimensional changeOutside diameter swell and wall thinning against nominalCreep strain accumulated, and whether the tube was already at the replacement criterion
Deposit and scale chemistryInternal deposit and external scale analysed by EDS and wet chemistryWhether the driver was water chemistry, fuel chemistry or both

Where the failure raises a question about the rest of the circuit, the tube evidence feeds directly into a remaining life assessment. TCR has completed 400+ boiler remaining-life assessments and, within the TCR group, the Central Boilers Board's remnant life assessment recognition is held by TCR Advanced Engineering, Vadodara.

What to Send, and How to Cut It

A tube failure investigation is only as good as the section that reaches the laboratory. The single most common avoidable problem is a sample cut too close to the damage, which removes the material the comparison depends on.

  • Length: at least 300 mm either side of the failure where the outage allows it, so that undamaged parent material from the same tube is available as the control.
  • Orientation: mark the fireside, the crown and the flow direction on the tube before it is cut. Once the section is off the wall that information cannot be recovered.
  • Cutting: cut cold where possible. A torch cut through the region of interest destroys the microstructure that the investigation is there to read.
  • Deposits: do not clean, flush or wire-brush the internal surface. The deposit is evidence, and in a caustic gouging or acid phosphate case it is the primary evidence.
  • Identification: the tube specification, the location in the circuit, the elevation, the hours in service and the operating conditions, including any recent excursion.

Where the unit is down and a decision is needed inside the outage, say so at the point of sampling. The sequence is ordered to give the operational answer first and the full documented report after.

The Fleet Question, Answered Without Cutting

One failed tube raises the question of every tube on the same header and every unit of the same design. Cutting the rest out to answer it is not an option, which is what in-situ metallographic replication is for.

  • In-situ metallography to ASTM E1351: the microstructure is read in place, on the live component, with no cutting and no sample removal. TCR has taken more than 100,000 in-situ replicas and fields 12 in-situ metallographic teams across the group.
  • Hardness in place: portable hardness on the same locations, so degradation is scored against two independent measurements.
  • Replica interpretation against an archive: a replica is only as good as the reference base it is read against, and TCR reads them against its own.
  • Where it leads: a boiler audit, a remaining life assessment under Regulation 391A of the Indian Boiler Regulations, or a knowledge-based risk assessment that ranks the circuit rather than the single tube.

Adani Power Mundra had its 4,620 MW boiler and piping fleet assessed this way, at 20 days per unit. Reliance Jamnagar had 1,200 in-situ replicas taken and interpreted in 15 days inside a live turnaround.

The book on boiler tube failure, written here

Paresh Haribhakti, Managing Director of TCR Advanced Engineering, wrote Failure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach with P.B. Joshi and Rajendra Kumar. ASM International, the American materials society, published it on 1 December 2018. The investigations behind this service page and the investigations behind that book are the same body of work.

Front cover of Failure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach, ASM International, 2018
ASM International, 2018.

The book is a comprehensive treatment of boiler tube failure: the recognised damage mechanisms, from short-term and long-term overheating through waterside and fireside corrosion, caustic gouging, hydrogen damage, stress corrosion cracking, creep, corrosion fatigue, erosion and graphitisation; the field and laboratory evidence that identifies each one, including in-situ metallography, oxide-scale measurement, dimensional survey, replication and fractography; and the corrective and preventive actions that follow from the diagnosis. It draws on more than 1,500 boiler tube failure investigations carried out by the TCR group.

ASM's own description: “Coal-fired power plants rely on a network of boiler tubes that would stretch several kilometers if placed end to end. These tubes operate under extreme conditions and, despite due care, fail from time to time, leading to forced outages. Failure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach is a detailed guide to understanding damage mechanisms and how to identify and control them. It covers operating principles and interactions, material properties and selection, characterization tools and techniques, and application challenges. It also includes information on water chemistry and life assessment, and presents several well-illustrated case histories.”

FieldValue
TitleFailure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach
AuthorsParesh Haribhakti, P.B. Joshi, Rajendra Kumar
PublisherASM International
Publication date1 December 2018
Print ISBN978-1-62708-156-6
Electronic ISBN978-1-62708-253-2
DOI10.31399/asm.tb.fibtca.9781627082532
Publisher's pagedl.asminternational.org

Both the book extract and TCR's own six-page investigation primer are in the Documents section below.

The book, in the author's words

Paresh Haribhakti on Failure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach, the book he wrote with P.B. Joshi and Rajendra Kumar and ASM International published in 2018.

Paresh Haribhakti, MD TCR Advanced gives a synopsis of the book authored on "Boiler Tube Failures"

Documents

Download the reference documents for this page. Every file is hosted on this domain and is also listed in the site document library.

  • Boiler Tube Failure Investigation

    Presentation on boiler tube failure investigation: the damage mechanisms that take tubes out of service and the metallurgical evidence that separates them.

    PDF (746 KB)

  • Failure Investigation of Boiler Tubes: A Comprehensive Approach (ASM International)

    Paresh Haribhakti, P.B. Joshi and Rajendra Kumar, published by ASM International on 1 December 2018 (print ISBN 978-1-62708-156-6, electronic ISBN 978-1-62708-253-2, DOI 10.31399/asm.tb.fibtca.9781627082532). The book is a comprehensive treatment of boiler tube failure: the recognised damage mechanisms from short-term and long-term overheating through waterside and fireside corrosion, caustic gouging, hydrogen damage, stress corrosion cracking, creep, corrosion fatigue, erosion and graphitisation; the field and laboratory evidence that identifies each one, including in-situ metallography, oxide-scale measurement, dimensional survey, replication and fractography; and the corrective and preventive actions that follow from the diagnosis. It draws on more than 1,500 boiler tube failure investigations carried out by the TCR group. Launched at a public event and used as a reference by power, refinery and fertiliser operators.

    PDF (313 KB)

Related insights

11 published insights on this site bear directly on Boiler Tube Failure Analysis. The 6 most recent are below; the full index carries all 93 Asset Integrity insights.

Read all 93 Asset Integrity insights →All insights →

Frequently asked questions

How are boiler tube failure mechanisms classified?

They fall into six families: stress rupture, water-side corrosion, fire-side corrosion, erosion, fatigue, and lack-of-quality or maintenance damage. Each family carries its own named mechanisms, and a TCR report names the specific mechanism rather than the family, drawing on 1,500+ documented tube failure investigations.

How do you estimate the tube metal temperature after the failure?

From the tube. Steam-side oxide scale thickness measured metallographically gives an estimate of the accumulated temperature history, and the microstructural degradation stage, spheroidisation through carbide coarsening to creep cavitation, gives an independent read of how far through creep life the material has run. The two are reported together.

How long a tube section should be sent?

At least 300 mm either side of the failure where the outage allows it, so undamaged parent material from the same tube is available as a control. Mark the fireside, the crown and the flow direction before cutting, cut cold where possible, and do not clean the internal surface.

Can the internal deposit be analysed as well as the metal?

Yes, and in a caustic gouging, acid phosphate corrosion or hydrogen damage case the deposit is the primary evidence. It is analysed by EDS and by wet chemical methods. Flushing or wire-brushing the tube before it is sent removes the answer.

Does a tube failure investigation lead to a remaining life assessment?

It does where the evidence points beyond the one tube. The same metallurgical evidence feeds a remaining life assessment of the circuit, and TCR has completed 400+ boiler remaining-life assessments and, within the TCR group, the Central Boilers Board's remnant life assessment recognition is held by TCR Advanced Engineering, Vadodara.

Is TCR recognised under the Indian Boiler Regulations?

Yes. TCR Engineering has been an IBR Well-Known Material Testing Laboratory since 2014, Form XVI-H certificate 38, valid to 2 April 2029.

Why does the same boiler tube fail again after it is replaced?

Because replacing the tube removes the symptom and leaves the cause in place. If the failure was long-term overheating under internal scale, a water chemistry upset or a flue-gas imbalance, the new tube sees the same conditions and follows the old one. Naming the mechanism is what lets the plant correct the circuit rather than the tube.

Does TCR investigate fired heater and industrial boiler tubes as well as power station boiler tubes?

Yes. Refinery and petrochemical fired heater tubes and captive and industrial boiler tubes are investigated alongside utility superheater, reheater, economiser and waterwall tubes. The same Navi Mumbai laboratory reads the microstructure, the scale and the deposit, and the damage taxonomy changes only where the fuel and the process chemistry change.

Send the tube section, and the answer comes back before the next outage.

Request a Quote
Chat on WhatsApp